Women love shopping. OK. Most women thrive on shopping, and why not? Even experts say it is therapeutic. To perfect the art, women biblically follow the adage, “if it doesn’t fit, don’t buy”, some advice that has saved them ending up with pieces they cannot wear a month later. The difficult part comes when the same wisdom is applied to their search for partners, resulting in tragic results and conclusions- women are impossible to please.
So impossible that an Internet joke has been spurned about it. It is about a store that has husbands for sale. The store has six floors and the attributes of the men increase as a shopper ascends the flights. There is a catch though- a shopper can only go up or exit the building on whatever floor he/she is on. By the time the shopper is on the fifth floor, the deal is already too good. The men there have jobs, love the Lord, love kids, are drop-dead gorgeous, help with the housework, and have a strong romantic streak. One particular shopper goes on to the sixth floor and there finds a sign that reads: Floor 6 – You are visitor 4,363,012 to this floor. There are no men on this floor. This floor exists solely as proof that women are impossible to please. Thank you for shopping at the Husband Store. Watch your step as you exit the building, and have a nice day!
If such a store ever existed, then the number of those visiting floor six can only go one way- up. Forget women’s fascination with the bad-boy-cum-jerk phenomenon. Deep inside, all women are longing for that man who will treat them like the queens they believe they are, and any man who even comes close to such a description will find himself in very high demand. And I can guess the female variation of that joke- the women here have no kids, earn less than you… what were the other characteristics Info-track Research and Harris Interactive came up with?
But do perfect men exist? No, do perfect partners exist- you know- those from Adam’s rib bone allegory, that if you miss them once, you have missed on destiny? And is that partnerhood mutual in the sense that your Mr/Mrs Right will think the same of you?
It is normal to have ideals of the kind of partners we think we need. Women in particular go through their search for lifetime partners armed with a shopping list of ‘have to’ and ‘absolutely not’ characteristics. Tall, dark, handsome… Anyone who does not even come close to that is promptly checked off the list. Some, amidst the rubble, unearth their gem. But many will testify to having kissed enough frogs hoping that hidden beneath was the prince who would match them to the sunset, only to discover that WYSIWYG (what you see is what you get) is not just for desktop publishing.
We will not all be lucky to find the partner who maps our childhood mental beau. Even probability can prove that. A certain self appointed statistician went to the trouble of explaining why he will never meet his proverbial girl. I will not try to explain or understand the standard deviation principles and statistics theories used to come up with the results (I skipped STA 110 classes), but he concluded that as a 21 year old from North America; looking for a beautiful female aged 18-25, with a wee bit of intelligence (not so much to ask for), it would take him 3493 weeks (that’s nearly 67 years) of daily blind dates before he met one of the 18726 probables in the entire world. Taking into consideration our life expectancy, he would be dead (and her too) before he found her.
After all that, do you still need more evidence why you should just learn to live with his small misdemeanors and hope he will style up under your tutelage? Or why you should just learn to embrace her 40”+ waistline and her nagging and meanwhile get a life insurance?
So what is so wrong with settling for nothing but the best? Assuming the “till death do us part” vows are for real, it is only fair to have in mind what you really want. And even professionally we know only specific goals work.
We cannot begrudge anyone who feels shortchanged on what they got at the end of their wedding night, or whatever variation we have made of that. We can even try and understand their plight as they search of the perfect man/woman, only too discover that they will never come with all the trappings you need them to and even when they do, the packaging is often all so wrong you may fail to recognise them. It is only those who have the patience to scour beneath the mismatched clothes, nose-mining fingers, crazy weave, shallow laughter, loud belching (and snoring), funny accent and body odour problem, who may brandish their had earned trophy of frog-turned prince/ess.
I am not trying to discourage all those who are armed with a fantasy list of the man who will keep them warm in old age (if it lasts that long).
The sad fact at the end of the day is that perfect partners never existed and if they did, they went extinct a number of millennia ago. Ditching a list though does not mean giving up any standards and facing life with an empty slate and open mind. It rather means being open to the mysterious, unpredictable nature of love and gauging how we rate as partners before we can rate others.
For even when you think you found him/her, you will find that they come more in raw material form, and it is only hard work and persistent belief and faith in them that will give you what you have been searching for. Perfection does not create a perfect bond, love does. And the fun is not in getting there, it is in the journey of growth and transformation for the two of you.
